GitLab

One Australian company has actually discouraged staff from using the innovation, others are scrambling for recommendations on its cybersecurity implications - while federal government ministers are prompting caution.

But others have actually welcomed DeepSeek's arrival, requiring Australia to follow China's lead in establishing powerful yet less energy-intensive AI innovation.

In the days since the Chinese company released its R1 expert system design and publicly released its chatbot and app, it has actually upended the AI industry.

- Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news e-mail

Several global industry leaders saw their market worths drop after the launch, as DeepSeek showed AI might be developed using a fraction of the cost and processing required to train designs such as ChatGPT or Meta's Llama.

Its arrival may signify a new industry shift, however for federal government and organization, the effect is uncertain. Whereas ChatGPT's 2022 arrival caught governments and companies by surprise as personnel started to try the new AI innovation, at least for the arrival of Deepseek, some had a playbook.

Business as typical

A spokesperson for Telstra said the company had "a rigorous procedure to evaluate all AI tools, abilities, and utilize cases in our service", consisting of a list of authorized generative AI tools, and standards on how to use them.

For now at Telstra, DeepSeek is not approved and its use is not encouraged (although it's not officially blocked).

"Our favored partner is MS Copilot, and we're presenting 21,000 Copilot for Microsoft 365 licences to our workers."

Other companies sought immediate advice on whether DeepSeek ought to be embraced.

Major Australian cybersecurity company CyberCX's executive director of cyber intelligence, Katherine Mansted, asteroidsathome.net said consumers had already approached the for advice on whether the innovation was safe.

"That's not a surprise, because it appears the entire world has been in a little bit of a DeepSeek frenzy - both the financially and market likely and those with the security lens," Mansted said.

DeepSeek and government

CyberCX this week took the unusual action of quickly releasing guidance recommending organisations, including federal government departments and those saving delicate details, strongly think about restricting access to DeepSeek on work devices.

"We understand that there is no proactive policy here from federal government ... We've been down this road in the past," Mansted stated. "We have actually had debates about TikTok, about Chinese monitoring cams, about Huawei in the telco network, and we always act after the reality, not before the truth ... Here, particularly because the dangers are around compromise of sensitive info, in regards to any details that you put into this AI assistant: it's going straight to China.

"We believed we needed to act much faster this time."

Under federal AI policy executed in September 2024, companies have till the end of February 2025 to release transparency documents about their usage of AI.

But understanding who makes decisions on the specific use of DeepSeek in the federal government has proved challenging. The chief law officer's department, which made the decision to prohibit TikTok utilize on government devices, referred inquiries to the Digital Transformation Agency, which in turn referred enquires to the Department of Home Affairs.

Home Affairs was asked on Thursday for its main policy and did not offer an action by the time of publication.

Familiar arguments ...

A few of the response in Australia to DeepSeek is by now familiar. There have actually been calls to ban the technology, amidst concern over how the Chinese government might access user data - an echo of the days Huawei was prohibited from the NBN and 5G rollouts in Australia, and more recently, of the dispute over banning TikTok.

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a strong critic of the China federal government, said today that Australia "can not continue the present approach of reacting to each brand-new tech development". It called for a tech strategy covering AI that consisted of investing in sovereign AI abilities.

The industry minister, Ed Husic, stated on Tuesday it was prematurely to decide on whether DeepSeek was a security threat.

Sign up to Breaking News Australia

Get the most essential news as it breaks

"If there is anything that presents a danger in the nationwide interest, we will constantly keep an open mind and view what occurs. I think it's prematurely to jump to conclusions on that," he stated. "But, again, if we need to act, then responsible federal governments do."

He worried that Australia is "in the lasts" of preparing its response and would develop its own regulative settings.

"The US is flagging their technique. The EU has theirs. Canada also will have a various technique. And our local partners too are taking a look at this," he stated.